|
|
|
|
Evolution
vs. Science
Nothing
From Nothing Leaves Nothing!
|
"Nothing From Nothing" from Sean's Radical Midi Page Surely there is an evolutionist out there that once sang this song! |
"We
have had enough of the Darwinian fallacy. It's about time we cry 'the emperor
has no clothes.'" ---Ken Hsu, Geological Institute at Zurich, Former President
of the International Association of Sedimentologists
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
Moon |
Earth |
|
matter is eternal |
It is not physically or logically possible for matter to create itself from nothing. The universe cannot be eternal because this violates several scientific laws such as the First & Second Laws of Thermodynamics, which teach that the universe had to have a beginning, all matter and energy is becoming less ordered and less complex, everything is running down, and left to its own, will one day become lifeless and inert. It is more logical to believe that the universe was created by God than by nothing, because out of nothing, nothing comes. To ascribe absolute power to nothing is to engage in myth making and magic, not science | God
the Eternal Creator and Self existing, created all matter and energy. Everything
is decaying because of one man's sin. God is the creator and sustainer
of all things.
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him. -- Colossians 1:16 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever. 1John 2:17. |
 |
||
| The Big Bang theory adequately explains the existence, features, and evolution of our universe | The
Big Bang theory is the best naturalistic hypothesis science can currently
envision in attempting to explain how the universe might have come into
being apart from divine creation. The difficulty is that this theory has
too many irremediable problems, including how the "cosmic egg" ever originated;
predica-
ments and background radiation; the "flatness" quandary; and how a chance explosion of matter could ever produce such incredibly fine tuned accuracy to result in extremely ordered galaxies, solar systems, planets, and moons. The facts of science strongly argue that a Big Bang origin for the universe is not possible. |
God
created everything in 6 days in a series of acts occurring as stated in
(Gen 1)
Hebrews Chapter 11
|
 |
||
| There is an adequately theory to explain the origin, features, and evolution of our solar system | No theory even comes close to adequately explaining the existence of our solar system. Many supposed truths concerning evolution have turned out to be false. | Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. 1 John 3:1. |
 |
||
| Life in its simplest forms could originate on earth by chance. Natural processes are all that's needed. | This is not physically or mathematically possible. This idea violates the Law of Biogenesis, that life originates only from life, as well as other scientific laws, and is proven false by the science of probability. The chance that life could evolve from non life is statistically zero no matter how old the universe. | God created all life forms fully formed and functional God created Adam & Eve fully formed and functional. Only God can create life. |
 |
"It is virtually impossible that life has originated by a random association of molecules." ---Henry Quastler in The Emergence of Biological Organization, Yale University Press |
|
| Many evolutionists believe the odds of evolution occurring are 1 in 10250 (the figure 1 with 250 zeros) | Borél's single law of chance tells us that when the chance exceeds 1 chance in 1050, absolutely no chance remains for an event to occur. | For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? - John 5:46-47 |
 |
||
| Origin of life experiments prove that life could have evolved in the primitive oceans | On the contrary, a critical look at life experiments over the last 80 years only show that it is not possible for life to have evolved from primitive oceans | Thou,
even thou, art Lord alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens,
with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas,
and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of
heaven worshippeth thee. - Nehemiah 9:6
On the fifth day, sea life was created, and the waters swarmed with all the various kinds of sea creatures. (Gen 1:20-22) Sea life did not precede land life. (Gen 1:11-13, 1:20-23) Fish and birds were created on the same day. Fish were created swimming and birds were created flying. (Gen 1:11, 21-22) |
 |
||
| Once primitive life had evolved, more complex life evolved from it | No evidence exists in support of this idea, other than the assumption that evolution must have occurred since it is the only "credible" or "possible" theory to explain life. We have never seen a new kind of life evolve. | God's
creation was perfect but has been spiraling downward since the fall toward
less organization and less complexity (Genesis 1:31; Romans 5:12,14; 8:22)
God saw all that He had made, and it was "very good." (Gen 1:31) Since then, things have deteriorated (Gen 3:16-19, Rom 8:18-22) and diversified. |
 |
||
| The fossil record offers positive evidence and even proof for gradual evolution, showing how more primitive life forms evolved into more complex life forms, such as fish to amphibians to reptiles and the higher primates to man | The
fossil record only offers a history of stability, not gradual change. Macro-
evolution would require an upward change in the complexity of certain traits
and organs. Microevolution only involves horizontal changes, or no increasing
complexity. The inbetween forms (or inter-
mediates), which should be vast in number if macroevolution occurred, are never seen—as fossils or living species. The fossil record should be full of evolutionary transitions, despite evolutionists' arguments to the contrary. But not only is this not the case, the fossil record does not contain even a single undisputed evolutionary transition that would help document evolutionary theory. There are no fossils that are in-between fossils (evolving into a new species/kind). Every fossil that is found is fully formed and functional. There are no fossils that have half fins and half legs, or half scales and half wings. |
The
fossil record testifies that God created creatures after their kind.
And
God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which
the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every
winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God
blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in
the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
|
 |
||
| The evidence of human evolution from a 'common ancestor' is highly persuasive | There is no evidence for human evolution. The fossil remains are far too scanty and unreliable. As a result, they are subject to constant debate and dispute within the scientific community. In fact as is true in so many other fields, the actual evidence strongly supports creation. | There
are permanent discontinuities between different kinds of life. The Bible
states that each "kind" will reproduce after itself. (Gen 1) The kinds
are fixed and distinct.
Man, who was given dominion over all animals, was created in the image of God. (Gen 1:26-27, 1:30, 5:1) Man was made "a little lower than the angels." (Ps 8:5) Ah Lord God! behold, thou hast made the heaven and the earth by thy great power and stretched out arm, and there is nothing too hard for thee: Jeremiah 32:17 |
Venus |
"Evolutionist claim their theory is scientific. Where is the science? I can assure the reader the American Kennel Club would not certify an ancestor of your dog based on evidence such as paleontologists present." ---Isaac V. Manly, M.D., Harvard Medical School |
Neptune |
| Evolution occurs by mutation, natural selection, and genetic recombination | No valid explanatory mechanism for evolution exists. Once more, this is the best hypothesis naturalistic science can come up with. The actual scientific evidence shows that mutations, natural selection, and genetic recombination could not evolve life. | God finished "all His work" in six days. (Gen 2:1-3; Ex 20:11, 31:17; Heb 4:1-11) Creation was a distinct event. (Ps 148:5) |
 |
||
| Evolution is a scientific fact | Not only is evolution not a scientific fact, it is not even a good scientific theory because it violates so many scientific laws, cannot be tested, and is lacking in real evidence. Evolution is simply a materialistic postulate that attempts to explain the origin of life on the basis of natural causes without recourse to a divine creator. | Well,
do they think it is a scientific fact or a theory? God's word is consistent.
The origin of life never changes. God's word stays the same in every debate.
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways. James 1:8. |
Mars |
"The theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, almost entirely useless, and the subject of superstitious awe." ---David Berlinsky, Mathematician |
Uranus |
| No reputable scientists believe in creation | Because
the evidence for evolution is lacking, literally thousands of reputable
scientists all over the world believe in creation. Thou-
sands more have abandoned belief in evolution and either become theists in a general sense, or remain agnostic on the subject of origins. Among those believing in creation: Joseph Lister, Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur, Johann Kepler, and many others. |
They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. 1 John 4:5,6. |
Jupiter |
"To my mind, the theory does not stand up al all....we must go further than this and admit that the only acceptable explanation is creation." ---H.S. Lipson, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology |
 |
| Creation science is a contradiction of terms, violates the basic principles of science, is a betrayal of the scientific method, and should not be allowed in public school classrooms | Theistic or creation science is not a contradiction of terms, nor is it a betrayal of the scientific method, or the principles of science. As philosophers of science have repeatedly pointed out, theistic science is just as valid an approach to origins as materialistic science. Placing it alongside evolution in the classroom teaches students to think critically about origins instead of being indoctrinated or brainwashed with evolution. | Science
should begin with theistic assumptions.
Colossians
Chapter 2
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 2 Timothy 4:3. |
 |
||
| There is not a shred of scientific evidence for creation | The evidence is sufficiently persuasive that there is now a growing movement within scientific circles to explore the possibility of supernatural design. The evidence for supernatural design has always been persuasive, but with increasing scientific discovery, it is becoming even more so, causing many unprejudiced scientists to re-evaluate their commitment to naturalism. | If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words,...1 Timothy 6:3,4 |
|
|
||
| Evolutionist counter arguments have refuted creationist claims | The scientific establishment has never successfully refuted creationist arguments, which is why thousands of qualified scientists remain creationists. Creationists ranks are growing daily due to the functional inadequacies of evolutionary theory and the growing and persuasive scientific evidence for supernatural design. If evolutionists had ever refuted creation science, they would not keep losing scientific debates with creation scientists. | Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself. 1 Timothy Chapter 6:5. |
|
|
||
| Science has proven that the universe is about 15 billions of years old and the earth about 4.6 billion years old. | The scientific evidence is inconclusive. There is legitimate scientific evidence for both an old Earth and a young Earth. Only when the scientific evidence for an old Earth is conclusive can scientists declare it is a fact the Earth is billions of years old. Until then, scientists should keep an open mind to credible evidence for a young earth. Evolution, of course, cannot occur without billions of years. Hence, if evolution is perceived as fact, an old earth is a necessity. But fair-minded scientist should not allow the scientific "necessity" for an old Earth to interpret their geochronological and related data. | The universe as we know it, was created in 6 days about 6,000 - 10,000 years ago. The earth was created before the sun moon and stars. |
|
|
||
| Science is an unbiased discipline and scientists are neutral observers of the natural world | Regrettably, modern science is held captive to the unjustified presupposition of methodological naturalism that drastically colors its interpretation of the scientific data. | |
|
|
||
| Since scientists are open-minded, they are open-minded to the theory of creation | Scientists are generally close-minded to the theory of creation; indeed many scientists have exhibited a bias quite alien to the spirit of true scientific inquiry, even persecuting creation scientists in reprehensible ways. | Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse. -- Romans 1:19-20 |
|
|
||
| Evolution is science, creation is a religious faith | Both
evolution and creation may be either scientific or religious. Evolution
is just as much a religion as creation except that it requires much greater
faith to except. Both evolution and creation require a miracle --the issue
is which miracle is credible.
"Many scientists have prematurely accepted Darwin's theory as fact and then scrambled to find evidence for it, unsuccessfully. Although many difficulties have mounted for evolution, these scientists have clung to the theory out of fear of encouraging "religious fundamentalism" and in the process have turned belief in Darwinism into their own religion". - Darwin on Trial , Phillip E. Johnson |
God
created the laws of science, which we are bound by. The Bible has a proven
track record - accurate in all accounts concerning archaeology,
prophecy,
manuscript evidence and science.
...Keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. 1 Timothy Chapter 6:20,21. |
Pluto |
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups." ---Dr. Louis Bounoure, Director of the Zoological Museum and Director of Research at the National Center of Scientific Research in France |
 |
| Evolution is purely a scientific theory without larger spiritual, social, moral, and political ramifications | It terms of it philosophical implications, evolution has major and almost entirely negative spiritual, moral, social, and sometimes even political ramifications. | Romans
Chapter 7
14. For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. Romans
Chapter 8
1 Corinthians
Chapter 2
|
|
|
||
| The theory of evolution has been a great boon to scientific progress | Whatever its limited scientific benefits, evolutionary theory has hindered the progress of science in numerous ways and been more destructive than helpful to the welfare of science. There have been many changes and mistakes in the model of evolution. As new and better science is learned, the ideas about how evolution took place also change. | 2
Timothy Chapter 4
4. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. The message of Creation in the Bible has never changed. The same story has been told for thousands of years. |
|
only life can produce life. 
The First Law of Thermodynamics: The total sum of all matter and energy in the universe is constant, it is not now being created nor destroyed. |
Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more or less than the great cosmogenic myth of the 20th century....The overridings supremacy of the myth has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved 100 years ago and that all subsequent biological research--paleontological, zoological and in the new branches of genetics and molecular biology has provided ever increasing evidence for Darwinian ideas...Nothing could be further from the truth." ---Michael Denton, M.D., Molecular Biologist |
The Second Law of Thermodynamics: All matter and energy go from a state of order and complexity to a state of less order and less complexity. |
| Scientific journals offer persuasive evidence for the truth of evolution | Scientific journals only offer evidence for micro evolution; the unequivocal evidence for macro evolution is nonexistent. Evolutionists do have technical and sophisticated arguments for their position, but when these are broken down and critically examined, they are either not that credible or do not offer the best explanation of the data. Creation science cannot explain everything either, but overall it does a much better job with the first principles. This is so even though evolutionists have had 150 years to document their ideas and billions of research dollars, while creation scientists have had only 20 years and almost no research funding. | 2
Corinthians Chapter 10
5. We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ. |
|
|
||
| There is no ultimate purpose for man, who is merely a chance product of the impersonal cosmos | The Law of Cause and Effect - Every effect must have an equal or greater cause. | God
is the first great cause and the universe is the effect. The ultimate purpose
of man is to know God personally, to glorify him, and to live with him
forever.
Colossians Chapter
2
|
|
|
||
| Death brings eternal extinction, it's a natural process. | Death
brings eternal life with God or eternal separation from God. Death is the
result of one man's sin.
It is sown a natural
body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there
is a spiritual body.
|
| If people like Darwin, Sagan and O'Hare could have one last chance to speak their mind, they'd probably do it in a song such as this one. |
|
Sean's Radical Midi Page |
| I
started a joke which started the whole world crying. But I didn't see that
the joke was on me, oh no.
I started to cry which started the whole world laughing. Oh If I'd only seen that the joke was on me. I looked at the skies running my hands over my eyes. And I fell out of bed hurting my head from things that I said. Till I finally died which started the whole world living. Oh If I'd only seen that the joke was on me. I looked at the skies running my hands over my eyes. And I fell out of bed hurting my head from things that I said. Till I finally died which started the whole world living. Oh If I'd only seen that the joke was on me. Oh
no that the joke was on me
|
Colossians
2:18. Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility
and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not
seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind
©1998,1999
Carol Melton Jones--All Rights Reserved
This site created
and maintained by cmj
©Carol Melton Jones, 1998,1999
©All
graphics within our site were created by cmj
or taken from disks we own unless otherwise specified.
"Welcome" and matching
graphics by In His Image. If you
have a problem with the site please contact webmaster@songofjoy.faithweb.com